Publications

2010
Globalization and collective action
Almeida, Paul D. 2010. “Globalization and collective action”. Pp. 305–326 in Handbook of Politics, edited by Kevin Leicht and J. Craig Jenkins. New York: Springer. Publisher's Version
almeida_2010_handbook_of_politics.pdf
Social movement partyism: Collective action and oppositional political parties
Almeida, Paul. 2010. “Social movement partyism: Collective action and oppositional political parties”. Pp. 170-196 in Strategic alliances: Coalition building and social movements, edited by Nella Van Dyke and Holly McCammon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Publisher's Version
almeida_strategic_alliances_2010.pdf
El Salvador: Elecciones y movimientos sociales
Almeida, Paul. 2010. “El Salvador: Elecciones y movimientos sociales”. Revista de Ciencia Política 30 (2):319–334. Publisher's Version Abstract
Esta investigación se enfoca en las elecciones presidenciales e históricas en El Salvador
en 2009. Hay un énfasis dado a la transformación del partido político FMLN en la
era después de la guerra civil y la alianza entre el partido y los movimientos sociales
en la sociedad civil. La combinación de los procesos de la democratización y las
políticas de liberalización económica en los 1990 y 2000 aportó al reforzamiento de la
coalición entre el partido de la izquierda y los movimientos populares. Gradualmente
el FMLN se podía canalizar la energía de las campañas de los movimientos sociales
contra las políticas neoliberales y opinión pública en triunfos electorales al nivel
local, parlamentario y Ejecutivo.
almeida_2010_rcp.pdf
2009
Social movements, political parties, and electoral triumph in el salvador
Almeida, Paul D. 2009. “Social movements, political parties, and electoral triumph in el salvador”. NACLA Report on the Americas 42 (6):16–21.
almeida_nacla_2009.pdf
2008
The Sequencing of Success: Organizing Templates and Neoliberal Policy Outcomes
In the 1990s and early 2000s, government privatization and austerity programs served as the cornerstone of free market reforms implemented throughout the developing world. The selling off of government utilities, resources, and services laid the groundwork for a highly contested battleground in the global South over social and economic distribution. This study examines the sequencing of campaigns against neoliberal reforms in Central America. Two successful movement campaigns against privatization in El Salvador and Costa Rica followed failed collective attempts to impede similar economic reforms. The policy outcomes against neo-liberal measures are explained by the path-dependent nature of the organizing templates activists chose to employ and the breadth of social movement unionism achieved. The article offers insights into similar battles currently waged in the third world over the pace of economic globalization and the conditions in which oppositional movements are likely to succeed or fail.
almeida_mobilization_vol_132_2008.pdf
Social Movements
Almeida, Paul. 2008. “Social Movements”. Pp. 603-608 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7, edited by W.A. Darity. Detroit: Macmillan.
Waves of protest: popular struggle in El Salvador, 1925-2005
Almeida, Paul D. 2008. Waves of protest: popular struggle in El Salvador, 1925-2005. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Publisher's Version Abstract

One of the first longitudinal studies of collective resistance in the developing world, Waves of Protest examines large-scale contentious action in El Salvador during critical eras in the country’s history.

Providing a compelling analysis of the massive waves of protests from the early twentieth century to the present in El Salvador, Paul D. Almeida fully chronicles one of the largest and most successful campaigns against globalization and privatization in the Americas. Drawing on original protest data from newspapers and other archival sources, Almeida makes an impassioned argument that regime liberalization organizes civil society and, conversely, acts of state-sponsored repression radicalize society. He correlates the ebb and flow of protest waves to the changes in regime liberalization and subsequent de-democratization and back to liberalization.

Almeida shows how institutional access and competitive elections create opportunity for civic organizations that become radicalized when authoritarianism increases, resulting at times in violent protest campaigns that escalate to revolutionary levels. In doing so, he brings negative political conditions and threats to the forefront as central forces driving social movement activity and popular contention in the developing world. 

Teaching Social Movements
Wood, Lesley J, Paul Almeida, and Benita Roth. 2008. Teaching Social Movements. Washington DC: American Sociological Association.
syllabi_2008_wood_almeida_roth.pdf
Gendered networks and health care privatization
Almeida, Paul, and Roxana Delgado. 2008. “Gendered networks and health care privatization”. Advances in Medical Sociology 10:273–299. Publisher's Version Abstract

Purpose – This study identifies the multiple contributions of the Salvadoran women’s movement in sustaining mass mobilization under the threat of public health care privatization.

Methodology/approach – A case study methodological approach shows how the emergence of an autonomous women’s movement in El Salvador in the late 1980s and early 1990s ‘‘spilled over’’ (Meyer & Whittier,1994) to assist in the maintenance of the health care campaigns in the late1990s and early 2000s.

almeida_delgado_2008.pdf
2007
Comparing Media Coverage of Opposition to Privatization and Economic Austerity Policies
Almeida, Paul. 2007. “Comparing Media Coverage of Opposition to Privatization and Economic Austerity Policies”. in Penn State University Workshop on Automated Text Identification and Classification for the Social Sciences. State College, PA. Abstract
Over the past twenty-five years the developing world has experienced several waves of popular contention against market reforms and welfare state retrenchment.  In the past decade, in Latin America alone, major social movement campaigns erupted in every country in the region over public sector privatization and economic austerity policies (Almeida 2007). For scholars and analysts of popular contention and policy changes, this recent upsurge in social movement activity in lesser-developed countries (LDCs) raises important issues in collecting protest event data given that prior studies on media bias and protest reporting focus on advanced industrialized democracies (McCarthy et al. 1996; Smith et al. 2001; Myers and Caniglia 2004). In order to address this shortcoming, I focus here on one major episode of collective action against neoliberal reform in Latin America – the 2002-2003 campaign against public health care privatization in El Salvador. By comparing the coverage of several media and movement sources we can observe the relative strengths of combining multiple reporting agents in gathering information and constructing data sets on social movement activity and policy reforms in the developing world.
almeida_posteropposition_to_privatization_2007_web.pdf
Organizational expansion, liberalization reversals and radicalized collective action
Almeida, Paul D. 2007. “Organizational expansion, liberalization reversals and radicalized collective action”. Research in Political Sociology 15:57–99. Publisher's Version Abstract
The paper addresses a core question in the literature on states and political challenges from excluded social classes: how is large-scale collective action possible against repressive governments in the global periphery? Using the case of El Salvador’s 1932 peasant-worker uprising, the paper contributes to theories of organizational expansion and radicalization in nondemocratic settings. The case study suggests that periods of regime liberalization deposit organizations in civil society that persist beyond the political opening in the system. Combining historical materials with logistic and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), it is found that the political threats constituting liberalization reversals provide negative incentives for surviving reform-minded organizations to attempt revolutionary forms of collective action in more hostile political environments.
Defensive mobilization: Popular movements against economic adjustment policies in Latin America
Almeida, Paul D. 2007. “Defensive mobilization: Popular movements against economic adjustment policies in Latin America”. Latin American Perspectives 34 (3):123–139. Abstract
In the current wave of defensive collective action across Latin America in response to
neoliberal globalization, working-class groups appear most frequently in the documented
protest events. The new wave of popular movement activity emerged in the region in the
late 1990s and early twenty-first century and is driven by the erosion of the economic
and social benefits previously available to the popular classes during the period of stateled
development.
lap_2007.pdf
El avance de la globalización neoliberal: una comparación de tres campañas de movimientos populares en Centroamérica
Almeida, Paul, and Erica Walker. 2007. “El avance de la globalización neoliberal: una comparación de tres campañas de movimientos populares en Centroamérica”. Revista Centroamericana de Ciencias Sociales (RCCS), ISSN 1659-0619, Vol. 4, Nº. 1, 2007, pags. 51-76. Abstract
Examinamos tres campañas contra la puesta en práctica de las políticas neoliberales de la segunda fase en América Central para determinar mejor los diferentes tipos de situaciones en las cuales los movimientos que desafían las reformas inducidas por la globalización, influyen en el avance y el carácter del proceso de implementación de la política
rccs_2007.pdf
2006
The Pace of Neoliberal Globalization: A Comparison of Three Popular Movement Campaigns in Central America
Almeida, Paul, and Erica Walker. 2006. “The Pace of Neoliberal Globalization: A Comparison of Three Popular Movement Campaigns in Central America”. Social Justice 33 (3):175-190. Abstract
What accounts for the varying outcomes of popular struggles that contest the character and content of neoliberal reforms throughout the developing world? We examine three campaigns against the implementation of second-phase neoliberal policies in Central America to better assess the kinds of situations in which movements challenging globalization-induced reforms influence the pace and character of the policy implementation process.
almeida_walker_2006.pdf
Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks
Johnston, Hank, and Paul Almeida, ed. 2006. Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Social movement unionism, social movement partyism, and policy outcomes: Health care privatization in El Salvador
Almeida, Paul. 2006. “Social movement unionism, social movement partyism, and policy outcomes: Health care privatization in El Salvador”. Pp. 57–76 in Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks, edited by Hank Johnston and Paul Almeida. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
almeida_2006_health_care.pdf
Neoliberal globalization and popular movements in Latin America
Almeida, Paul, and Hank Johnston. 2006. “Neoliberal globalization and popular movements in Latin America”. Pp. 3–18 in Latin American social movements: Globalization, democratization, and transnational networks, edited by Hank Johnston and Paul Almeida. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
almeida_johnston_2006.pdf
2005
Multi-sectoral coalitions and popular movement participation
Almeida, Paul D. 2005. “Multi-sectoral coalitions and popular movement participation”. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 26:63–99. Abstract
The article focuses on varying protest intensities of social movement activists
in an authoritarian political environment. Drawing on a sample of
participants in El Salvador’s El movimiento popular, the paper examines
how structural location in the resistance movement’s multi-sectoral organizational
infrastructure shapes the level of participation. Those motivated
by state repression and maintaining multiple or cross-sectoral
organizational ties exhibited higher levels of protest participation. The
findings suggest that more attention be given to how the multi-sectoral
network structure of opposition coalitions induces micro-mobilization
processes of individual participation in high-risk collective action.
almeida_2005.pdf
2004
The formation of state actor-social movement coalitions and favorable policy outcomes
Stearns, Linda Brewster, and Paul D Almeida. 2004. “The formation of state actor-social movement coalitions and favorable policy outcomes”. Social Problems 51 (4):478–504. Abstract
This study examines the role of loosely-coupled state actor-social movement coalitions in creating positive policy outcomes. It specifies the organizational locations within the state most conducive to state actor-social movement ties. Using the case of Japanese anti-pollution politics between 1956 and 1976, we demonstrate that favorable policy outcomes were the result of multiple coalitions between anti-pollution movements and state
agencies, opposition political parties, local governments, and the courts.
stearns_almeida2004.pdf
2003
Opportunity organizations and threat-induced contention: Protest waves in authoritarian settings
The article combines two strands of political process theory (opportunity and threat) in a changing authoritarian context. Through the use of protest event, archival, and secondary sources on El Salvador between 1962 and 1981, the study examines the outbreak and forms of two protest waves that are generated by the temporal sequencing of political opportunity and threat environments. The specific opportunities of institutional access and competitive elections motivate regime challengers to form durable civic organizations. This newly available organizational infrastructure can be used to sustain reformist contention in the near term as well as be radicalized to launch more disruptive and violent protest campaigns when opportunities recede and the political environment transitions to one characterized by mounting threats (state‐attributed economic problems, erosion of rights, and state repression).
ajs_2003.pdf

Pages